Pandemonium refers to a state of total chaos and confusion, where loud noise, disorder, and unrest dominate the atmosphere, most often in situations involving large crowds.
It is a term simply used to describe a state of wild confusion, blare or malady. It depicts situations in which regular rules and organization totally fall apart and individuals are yelling, fleeing in all directions, and acting erratically.
In such situations, emotions run high, communication breaks down, and it becomes extremely difficult for anyone in authority to restore calm or regain control.
That explains why the word is frequently used to describe riot scenes, stampedes, tense protests, or any other situation when chaos and chaos overpower order.
That was precisely the mood on Matchday 25 of the Nigeria Premier Football League encounter between Wikki Tourists FC and Katsina United on February 8, 2026.
READ ON: Kano’s Gwadabe, four others for FIFA’s course in Kigali
What started as a fiercely contested fixture quickly spiralled into chaos, with rising tensions spilling over both on and off the pitch.
As the match progressed, Wikki supporters engaged in unsporting behaviour, including throwing stones and other dangerous objects onto the pitch, disrupting play and endangering Katsina United players, officials, and match referees.
The incident highlighted serious lapses in crowd control and the urgent need for stronger measures to curb fan violence and protect the league’s integrity.
The reckless actions sparked panic on the pitch, disrupted play, and laid bare serious failures in crowd control and stadium security.
Thus, putting lives at risk and eroding the professionalism expected in top-flight football under the Nigeria Premier Football League banner.
The atmosphere deteriorated so badly that officials were left with no choice but to abandon the match for the day and reschedule the remainder of the match for the following morning to ensure the safety of players, officials, and spectators.
Following a thorough review, the Nigeria Premier Football League ruled that the fixture was marred by multiple security and conduct failures.
The Bauchi-based Wikki Tourists FC was found guilty of failing to provide adequate and effective security at the venue, a lapse that significantly contributed to the breakdown of order.
The lapse allowed unauthorised individuals to access restricted areas, breaching regulations meant to safeguard players, officials, and the integrity of the game.
The findings exposed serious deficiencies in crowd control and stadium management.
The Nigeria Premier Football League further confirmed that Wikki Tourists FC failed to rein in their supporters, leading to harassment, loss of personal belongings, and injuries to match officials as well as an official of Katsina United.
As disciplinary measures, the club was fined a total of ₦1.5 million to cover compensatory and medical expenses:
- ₦250,000 for the referee’s missing whistle
- ₦250,000 for the referee’s medical treatment
- ₦500,000 for an injured medical personnel
- ₦500,000 for an injured Katsina United official
In addition, Wikki Tourists faced further sanctions for serious breaches of league regulations:
- ₦1 million for unsporting conduct capable of bringing the game into disrepute
- ₦1 million for throwing dangerous objects onto the pitch
- ₦2 million for unlawfully detaining match officials and the visiting team for several hours, as well as causing an 18-minute delay before play could resume
The league noted that these penalties reflect the gravity of the infractions and serve as a strong warning to all clubs on the importance of crowd control, stadium security, and respect for match officials, stressing that any actions that endanger lives or undermine the integrity of the competition will attract severe consequences.
Beyond the financial penalties, the Nigeria Premier Football League has taken an even firmer stance by imposing a significant sporting sanction on Wikki Tourists FC.
The Bauchi-based club has been barred from hosting home matches in Bauchi, with immediate effect.
Consequently, all future home fixtures have been relocated indefinitely to the Jos Stadium, a move aimed at ensuring improved security, restoring order, and safeguarding players, officials, and supporters.
League authorities explained that the decision underscores their zero-tolerance approach to crowd violence and stadium misconduct, stressing that clubs must be held accountable for the actions of their supporters.
The relocation is expected to have both logistical and competitive implications for Wikki Tourists, serving as a strong reminder that maintaining discipline and providing adequate security are non-negotiable responsibilities for all participating teams.
Regrettably, this incident was not isolated, as similar security breaches were reported around the same season at several league venues across the country.
Disturbing scenes of crowd misconduct and inadequate matchday security were recorded in Kano, Katsina, Abeokuta, Kwara State, and Nasarawa State, among other locations I can readily recall.
These repeated incidents paint a worrying picture of widespread lapses in crowd control and stadium management, raising serious concerns about the safety of players, officials, and spectators.
The unfortunate trend highlights the urgent need for stronger security frameworks, stricter enforcement of league regulations, and greater accountability from host clubs to prevent further deterioration of standards and to protect the integrity of the competition.
Sadly, despite the monetary or fine and banishment disciplinary measures introduced by the Nigeria Premier Football League to curb hooliganism and restore order in our stadia, the intended impact has yet to be fully realised.
To me, the actions of the Nigeria Premier Football League do not reflect a genuine commitment to eradicating hooliganism from our league.
The measures taken appear more focused on collecting fines than addressing the root causes of fan violence and ensuring the safety of players, officials, and spectators.
Issuing multiple penalties without enforcing stricter preventive systems or holding clubs accountable for proper crowd management sends the message that the league prioritizes revenue over discipline.
True reform would require proactive security measures, consistent enforcement, and a clear strategy to prevent misconduct, rather than reacting only after incidents occur.
This is why, instead of decreasing, incidents of crowd unrest and security lapses continue to rise, creating a troubling picture of matchday safety across the league.
The persistent pattern of disorder underscores the urgent need for stronger preventive measures, stricter enforcement, and a more accountable approach to stadium management to protect players, officials, and fans alike.
What was meant to serve as a strong deterrent has instead highlighted deeper systemic issues, including weak enforcement, inadequate stadium security, and poor crowd management.
This growing trend not only threatens the welfare of players, officials, and genuine supporters but also undermines the credibility and integrity of the league.
It underscores the urgent need for more decisive action, consistent sanctions, and collaborative efforts among clubs, security agencies, and league authorities to finally bring hooliganism under control and restore confidence in Nigerian football.
This clearly shows that the Nigeria Premier Football League must rethink its current approach and adopt more decisive, far-reaching actions capable of putting a complete stop to hooliganism in our football.
The measures in place so far have proven inadequate, as incidents of crowd violence and misconduct continue to rise rather than decline.
What is urgently needed is a stronger framework that includes stricter enforcement of rules, heavier sanctions where necessary, improved stadium security, and greater accountability for clubs and supporters alike.
Only through firm, consistent, and proactive intervention can the league hope to restore discipline, protect all stakeholders, and rebuild public confidence in Nigerian football.
And for most of us, the only sustainable way forward for better management of the Nigeria Premier Football League requires a decisive shift from reactive punishment to proactive governance, structural reform, and institutional accountability.
The league must adopt a preventive, compliance-driven framework that guarantees safety, discipline, and professionalism before incidents occur rather than merely responding after damage has been done.
First, the NPFL should introduce a compulsory Pre-Season Security Certification Programme for all participating clubs.
No club should be licensed to host matches without presenting an approved Stadium Safety and Matchday Operations Plan.
This plan must include clear crowd control procedures, emergency response systems, secure access control, and defined roles for stadium management.
Certification should be renewed annually and subject to random mid-season inspections. This approach ensures that safety becomes a condition for participation, not an afterthought.
Secondly, the league should professionalize matchday operations by mandating a structured Stewardship System.
Clubs must recruit and train certified stadium stewards responsible for seating control, restricted area protection, tunnel security, and emergency coordination.
Reliance solely on conventional security personnel has proven inadequate. A trained, uniformed, and accountable stewarding structure will significantly reduce disorder and unauthorized pitch invasions.
Thirdly, the NPFL should establish a Central Security and Integrity Unit within its administrative structure.
This unit would monitor compliance, review match reports, analyse risk fixtures, and coordinate with security agencies nationwide.
High-risk matches should be identified in advance and provided with enhanced security deployment and supervisory presence. A data-driven risk assessment mechanism will prevent escalation rather than reacting to chaos.
Furthermore, the league must implement a clearly codified Sporting Sanctions Framework as financial fines alone have not produced sufficient deterrence.
The regulations should provide automatic sporting consequences for serious breaches, including points deduction, forfeiture of matches, suspension of stadium approval, and, in extreme cases, temporary disqualification.
When clubs come to understand that misconduct by their supporters or lapses in stadium management can directly impact their competitive standing, through measures such as points deductions, match forfeitures, or temporary bans from hosting games, they are far more likely to take proactive steps to ensure discipline.
This creates a culture of accountability where clubs recognize that failing to control fan behaviour or neglecting safety protocols doesn’t just result in fines, but can also harm their position in the league, affect player morale, and compromise their championship ambitions.
Over time, linking disciplinary measures to tangible competitive consequences strengthens compliance, reduces repeated violations, and fosters a professional, orderly environment across the league.
In addition, the NPFL should mandate installation of minimum surveillance infrastructure in all approved venues. Functional CCTV coverage of stands, technical areas, entry gates, and players’ tunnels must become compulsory.
Surveillance strengthens accountability, supports investigations, and deters misconduct. Any venue lacking these basic monitoring facilities should not be approved for top-flight competition.
The league should also institutionalize a Supporters’ Engagement and Control Policy. Clubs must formally register recognized supporters’ associations and appoint a Supporter Liaison Officer responsible for behavioral orientation and communication.
Supporter groups linked to violence should face structured sanctions, including temporary suspension of organized attendance privileges. Shared responsibility between clubs and supporters will enhance discipline.
Protection of match officials must be elevated to a non-negotiable standard. Secure entry and exit routes, controlled dressing room access, and guaranteed post-match evacuation protocols should be mandatory.
Any breach leading to harassment, detention, or assault of officials must trigger immediate suspension of venue approval pending investigation. The integrity of officiating is central to league credibility.
Moreover, the NPFL should introduce a phased Stadium Infrastructure Upgrade Policy. Minimum requirements must include proper perimeter fencing, turnstile entry systems, medical response units, fire safety equipment, and clearly marked emergency exits.
Clubs should be given a defined compliance timeline. Failure to meet infrastructural standards should result in temporary relocation until upgrades are completed.
Transparency and reporting are equally essential. Every match should conclude with a standardized digital incident report submitted within 24 hours by the match commissioner and security coordinator.
Repeated risk patterns at particular venues must trigger preventive interventions rather than repeated monetary sanctions.
Finally, the league must reposition security reform as a commercial strategy. Stability, safety, and professionalism attract sponsorship, broadcasting partnerships, and investor confidence.
NPFL should know that, a league frequently associated with violence undermines its own market value.
Therefore, restoring order is not merely disciplinary, it is economic and strategic.
In summary, the way forward for the NPFL lies in preventive certification, professional matchday management, structured sporting sanctions, technological surveillance, supporter accountability, infrastructural modernization, and data-driven oversight.
Only through firm, consistent, and system-based governance can the league restore credibility, safety, and long-term sustainability.
